INTRODUCTION As inflation continues to trend lower, most central banks appear to be done hiking interest rates. The European Central Bank...
Rising tensions between Russia, Ukraine and NATO have the world on edge, and many investors appear to be concerned. A major geopolitical event can send shockwaves through financial markets. However, predicting the behaviour of global leaders can be difficult for even the most seasoned foreign policy experts. Here, we look at three scenarios and how those potential outcomes could impact financial markets.
A frozen conflict
Russia, Ukraine and NATO could stay in a frozen conflict, with no party making a move that would significantly escalate the situation. We think this scenario would maintain the status quo, with no additional impact to financial markets or changes in government or central bank policy.
A partial invasion
In our view, a partial invasion would involve Russia making a land grab in Ukraine and/or initiating an aggressive cyberattack against the country or its allies. In this scenario, we think the US will likely apply some sanctions to Russia. The potential European response is less clear, since many European countries have economic interests in Russia and desire for constructive relations with the country.
We believe markets would have a strong risk-off reaction and then normalize quickly once it’s clear a full invasion is not underway. We would expect a short-lived rally in US Treasurys and the US dollar. In our view, the euro might take a modest hit on risk sentiment, but the currency’s fundamentals should support it longer term. Energy prices would likely spike, with a further rise if energy is included in sanctions. In this scenario, we believe the Federal Reserve and the European Central Bank would stay on course, cautiously removing financial accommodation.
A full invasion
If Russia launches a full invasion of Ukraine, we expect more severe sanctions from the US and NATO. In the US, we think Congress would likely move away from the Build Back Better budget in favour of a bipartisan agreement that would raise spending on military and cybersecurity, including a possible tax hike.
We believe markets would have a strong risk-off reaction, with a flight to perceived “safe harbor” assets like US Treasurys and the US dollar. The euro would likely take a temporary hit. In our view, a full invasion would trigger a severe spike in energy prices. We also see a possible impact on aluminium, titanium and uranium prices if Russia uses these commodities for leverage against the West.
In this scenario, we believe the Fed could temporarily delay its initial rate hike. The ECB might step up bond purchases if there is an impact on credit spreads, but any action would be the result of market behaviour rather than fundamental deterioration in our view.
Russia retains significant leverage against the West
Whatever the outcome, we think it’s important to remember that Russia currently has significant leverage against the West and plays a critical role in the global supply chain beyond oil and gas. The Russian state owns a significant stake in VSMPO-AVISMA, a Russian company that represents more than 30% of the global production of titanium. This company produces approximately 65% of Airbus’s titanium consumption, 35% of Boeing’s and the entirety of Brazilian company Embraer’s.[ii]
Russia’s leverage is not limited to commodities produced within its own borders. Moscow retains enormous influence in other post-Soviet states, including Belarus and Kazakhstan. Belarus is not only a major producer of potash and other commodities, but also home to BelAz, a Soviet-era manufacturer of the largest heavy trucks in the world, used by mines globally. Kazakhstan is a central player in numerous commodity markets, boasting the largest reserves of zinc, tungsten, and barite in the world. Kazakhstan also accounts for nearly a quarter of global uranium production, the second-largest reserves in the world.
We believe markets may be underappreciating Russia’s role in these global supply chains. We will be watching this area closely as the situation evolves. For a deeper dive into this topic, read Senior Sovereign Analyst Hassan Malik’s paper, “Consider the Less Obvious Dependencies on Russia.”
The information in this article is provided for general information purposes only and does not take into account the investment objectives, financial situation or needs of any person. Investors Mutual Limited (AFSL 229988) is the issuer and Responsible Entity of the Loomis Sayles Global Equity Fund (‘Fund’). Loomis Sayles & Company, L.P. is the Investment Manager. This information should not be relied upon in determining whether to invest in the Fund and is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any financial product, security or other instrument. In deciding whether to acquire or continue to hold an investment in the Fund, an investor should consider the Fund’s Product Disclosure Statement, available on the website www.loomissayles.com.au or by contacting us on 1300 157 862. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future performance. Investments in the Fund are not a deposit with, or other liability of, Investors Mutual Limited and are subject to investment risk, including possible delays in repayment and loss of income and principal invested. Investors Mutual Limited does not guarantee the performance of the Fund or any particular rate of return.
Stay up to date
with Loomis Sayles
Register to receive regular performance updates and regular insights from the Loomis Sayles investment teams, featured in the Natixis Investment Managers Expert Collective newsletter.
Throughout history, technology has propelled business innovation and advancement. As active equity managers with an eye toward long-term...
It’s all about finding businesses that can withstand the volatility of the market, says Eileen Riley of Loomis Sayles. There is a 50%...